top of page

Serenity residents frustrated by “dictator” developer

The Gallery

The idyllic setting of Serenity, a gated community in western New Providence, belies the simmering frustration among its residents who find themselves at the mercy of property developer Roy Solomon's unfair policies and unilateral decisions.


While property owners in the community technically possess a single vote each, the scales tip dramatically in Solomon's favor due to his ownership of a majority of the unsold, vacant lots within the community.


These vacant lots, which outnumber the sold properties, grant Solomon disproportionate influence, effectively consolidating decision-making power in his hands.


With each vacant lot representing a vote, Solomon wields a vetoing power over any initiatives or proposals put forth by the residents.


From arbitrary hikes in homeowners' association (HOA) fees to the imposition of new rules and regulations, Solomon exercises his authority with impunity, leaving residents powerless.


"The system is rigged against us," laments one resident, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Adding insult to injury, residents are burdened with the real property tax for amenities such as the clubhouse, yet they are barred from hosting functions or gatherings at the facility.

Their frustration has reached a boiling point, with residents calling for legal action to challenge Solomon's stranglehold on their community.

1,129 views4 comments

4 Comments


mantalban
May 15, 2024

There are three sides to every story:your side; my side; and the truth.


Like

Serenity Resident
Serenity Resident
May 13, 2024

This is a very one sided story. I am a Serenity resident and I have no problem with the rules of the association, the assessments, or feeling I am living under a dictatorship.  To give you some actual facts regarding this story. 

1-First and foremost the developer is not Roy Solomon.

2-The increase in HOA fees was voted on at the last AGM in November 2023 and was approved by members of the property owners association with the developer abstaining from using his shares.  The increased was passed by property owners not the developer.

3-The reason the increase was agreed upon by property owners was because after an audit had been done it was clear that the existing assessments were…

Like
mantalban
May 15, 2024
Replying to

We have to be very careful on how we present information. I am confused about how "2" was able to be done but not "6". Do you really believe in your wildest imagination that "2" could have gone any other way? Whether it's "Roy"or "Martin" or "Mary" is inconsequential to how property owners feel. Some may like what's happening ,some may not. If property owners overwhelmingly voted for the increase in fees, why aren't a number of them paying it ?(it's on the streets that some residents are denied certain priveleges based on non payment of fees). It appears to be parodoxical , where residents voted for this increase in fees but are not paying it An Extra Ordinary G…


Edited
Like

wendal lopez
wendal lopez
May 13, 2024

That is terrible, I thought those days were over

Like
bottom of page